- The Oil Patch
- Posts
- 🛢️ Why does Biden hate LNG?
🛢️ Why does Biden hate LNG?
Did you guess climate companies and renewable interests?
Good morning, here's what the Oilman has for you today:

Biden Admin in Last-Ditch Fearmongering Stab at LNG
The Biden administration has released a long-awaited report on LNG.
Its findings are anything but surprising.
In summary:
more LNG approvals will make domestic natgas more expensive
And they’ll compromise climate change efforts
Of course…the private sector realizes this is not accurate:
U.S. LNG export capacity is poised to double in next 5 yrs. Our new @SPGlobalstudy finds LNG exports would support nearly 500,000 jobs per year and add $1.3 trillion to GDP by 2040. Meanwhile, domestic prices remain among lowest in the world. Read Here:
— Daniel Yergin (@DanielYergin)
1:22 PM • Dec 18, 2024
The shadow of expensive gas
Higher gas prices at home are the central focus of the report.
It makes perfect sense, on the face of it.
The more demand there is for a commodity, the higher its price…
Unless supply responds, which the report has conveniently omitted.
U.S. gas producers have recently been curbing production.
Because prices have been too low. And that’s when the U.S. has become the largest LNG exporter in the world. But sure, gas prices are going up any minute now.
Or, imagine that, producers are going to boost output to respond to the higher demand.
Yes, there will be some price rises but these won’t be at the scale the DoE is warning about.
And that’s because the commodity market is a self-regulating mechanism. The moment prices rise too high, demand responds with a decline.
Despite the Biden Admin doing everything regulatory possible to stop U.S. LNG exporters...
— Adam Oxsen (@AdamOxsen)
4:22 PM • Dec 21, 2024
The hidden reason for the LNG hate
“The study found that additional US LNG exports would displace more renewables than coal globally,” the FT reported.
And there you have it.
It’s not about gas prices.
It’s not about emissions.
It’s about “displacing” precious wind and solar.
Simply because they can’t compete with gas and even coal. Did you know coal use this year hit a record?
So much for transition dreams.

Pay No Interest Until Nearly 2027 AND Earn 5% Cash Back
Some credit cards can help you get out of debt faster with a 0% intro APR on balance transfers. Transfer your balance, pay it down interest-free, and save money. FinanceBuzz reviewed top cards and found the best options—one even offers 0% APR into 2027 + 5% cash back!

Listen to Life of an Oil Man
Life of an Oilman has covered some big personalities:
Aubrey McClendon came from oilfield royalty — his great uncle was the co-founder of Kerr-McGee and an Oklahoma Governor.
In the latest Life of an Oilman, Adam Oxsen covers Aubrey’s rise from local-Oklahoma landman to a global, energy icon.
Go listen to Life of an Oilman.

Europe’s Big Oil Urges Forceful Transition
Shell and BP are calling on the EU to force consumers to buy “clean” products.
That’s how bad things have gotten with the transition.
Nobody wants it, so you have to force it on everyone.
EU energy policy is truly insane.
An EU commission is pressuring France to raise its renewable energy target to at least 44%.
~70% of France's electricity is produced by nuclear power.
A shift to solar & wind would increase emissions.
— Brian Gitt (@BrianGitt)
6:17 PM • Feb 17, 2024
Desperate supermajors
The EU has been pressuring Big Oil and heavy industries to spend big on emission cuts. This has significantly increased costs for these businesses.
It has done absolutely nothing good for their profitability, however.
So now they’ve grown desperate.
The only way to make their “low-carbon” efforts pay is through forceful measures. And this is exactly what they are asking of Brussels.
“We will need to focus on demand creation to achieve new investment prospects,” they said.
Then then proceeded to the threat, because there’s always a threat.
Unless such demand is created, they will leave Europe.
It’s actually as much a threat as an inevitable move prompted by necessity. If a business wants to survive it would look for livable & profitable conditions.
Conditions in Europe are far from livable & profitable for businesses.
The EU is now working on a new law which will FORCE all newly built houses from 2030 to install solar panels on the roof.
It all comes back to Agenda 2030.
— PeterSweden (@PeterSweden7)
12:32 PM • Apr 26, 2024
But forcing demand creation is a risky way to make those conditions livable again. The most likely outcome will be economic destruction.
Cost of living crisis on steroids
What happens if Big Oil and heavy industry get their way?
Everything they produce will become even more expensive.
When everything becomes more expensive, people buy less of it.
And yes, that includes food, too.
So, instead of higher demand, you get lower demand.
Instead of profits, you get more losses.
Rioting on the streets is also quite likely in such a scenario.

Tweet of the Day
Dear Managers & Engineers -
It's past noon on the Friday before Christmas. Expect 0% progress on your projects until January 6th.
Merry Crisis,
The Field Team— wtxoil (PIPE or DIE) (@wtxoil)
7:38 PM • Dec 20, 2024

Thanks for reading today’s Oil Patch!
Stay oily, my friend.
Two quick requests before you go:
If you found this useful, forward this email to a friend to spread the word. 👇
Take 1 second to answer the poll below 👇👇
What do you think of today's edition? |